Along with the rest of the world, Australia has been facing fuel insecurity due to global oil-market disruptions brought on by the war in Iran.

Since February 2026, one of the world’s most critical oil transit chokepoints, the Strait of Hormuz has been blocked by Iran as a tactical move in the conflict. This has caused catastrophic flow-on effects for oil trade, as 25% of the world’s seaborne oil trade transits the Strait, with 80% destined for Asia. This is particularly stressful news for Australians as our nation imports roughly 90% of its refined fuel, with the vast majority—about 76% of all supply (and over 90% of total imports) coming from the Asia-Pacific region.

While the country has largely avoided severe nationwide rationing so far, the effects of the disruption are showing up in public attitudes, behaviour, politics, and everyday life.

Here are some of the key ways oil insecurity has been impacting culture here:

Growing anxiety about national self-sufficiency

Since the crisis, Australians have become more aware of how dependent the country is on imported fuel, and how vulnerable that makes us. In light of growing global instability, public discussion has turned to energy sovereignty, supply-chain resilience, and how agile Australia is during international crises. Government decisions to expand fuel reserves and create a strategic fuel stockpile reflect these concerns. Since 2020, importers and refiners have been subject to a minimum stockholding obligation since 2023, which gives the government a reserve mechanism to release into the market in an emergency, which it has.

Understandably, many Australians find it ridiculous that a country that is a major energy exporter remains vulnerable to fuel disruptions, as most refined fuels are imported. This has led to intensified debates around our domestic refining capacity, export policies and the balance between fossil fuels and renewable energy. This pressure is likely to become a policy talking point come election time.

Shifts in transport behaviour

Higher fuel prices and fears of shortages have prompted the government, both local and nationwide, to encourage commuters to use public transport or alternative means of getting to work other than cars. In Victoria and Tasmania, this looked like temporary free public transport to help residents manage soaring petrol prices and fuel supply chain disruptions.

In the media, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has stated that Australia should respond to the global oil shock by accelerating its uptake of electric vehicles and renewable energy. The organisation’s chief economist, Stefano Scarpetta, recentlty stated:

“This crisis also demonstrates that the need to wean our economies off the dependency on fossil fuel imports is increasingly urgent.”

The fuel-security debate is strengthening public narratives around Australia’s need to ease our dependence on fossil fuels in favour of renewable energy alternatives – like home batteries, solar, and electric vehicles. In light of recent global events, this discussion is coming to be viewed not just as an environmental issue but also as a national-security and household-cost issue.

Australians can therefore expect to see our oil position used in any upcoming policy debates when it comes to discussions about our future energy direction. Conservatives in the country will argue for more domestic oil, gas, refining, and storage infrastructure, while the other side points to a long-term solution of reducing oil dependence through electrification and renewable energy. These competing visions have become part of broader cultural and political identity debates.

Regional and rural cultural impacts

Rural communities are especially sensitive to diesel supply because agriculture, freight, and mining depend heavily on it. Concerns about diesel availability have heightened awareness of the vulnerability of regional lifestyles and economies, at a time when farmers are already doing it tough in the face of climate events like extended wet seasons and drought. In some areas, fuel security has become a community issue rather than simply an economic one.

In an article for the ABC in April, South Australian Dairyfarmers’ Association (SADA) president Robert Brokenshire said the drought, spiking fuel prices, and a fertiliser shortage were resulting in “the most diabolical situation that we’ve seen in 40 to 60 years”.

“The drought was tough enough, but with this triple-whammy now I’m getting, as president of SADA, farmers ringing me, some three times a week, and I’m just talking to them because I know it’s mentally very, very tough for them, and tough for all of us farming at the moment,” said Brokenshire.

Increased cost-of-living stress

Rising fuel prices and scarcity also impact the wider community, with flow-on effects through nearly every aspect of daily life, including transport, food distribution, and consumer goods. As a result, household budgeting becomes a larger topic of conversation and concern for the public. This also has flow on effects to rural regions as people become more conscious of travel choices, as they forgo their usual holiday drives.

The biggest cultural impact is not widespread physical fuel shortages but a growing awareness that Australia’s modern lifestyle—from commuting and food supply to regional economies and national security—depends on vulnerable global fuel networks. That awareness is reshaping attitudes toward transport, energy policy, resilience, and Australia’s future economic identity.

Square Holes is a cultural insight studio.

We design mixed-method explorations of people and culture beyond the category, uncovering the patterns, tensions and shifts shaping behaviour to inform strategy, inspire innovation and enable confident decisions. Our studio model brings together the right mix of thinkers, researchers and specialists for each exploration.

If you’re navigating change, entering a new market, or seeking deeper understanding of people and culture – let’s start a conversation >